Mistakes watch related and not

General watch-related discussion
Post Reply
User avatar
Alou
VIP
VIP
Posts: 899
Joined: February 18th, 2020, 4:58 am

Member of the month

Frequent Flyer

VIP

HF veteran

Good neighbour

Re: Mistakes watch related and not

Post by Alou »

There is something wrong with the tachymeter,yes you are right takes time to spot,For most it could have been undetected but if used to count speed ,you will fin that it should have been 200 and to 200,Thats easy to replace though just change bezels.But how am i gona make $$$$ afterwards !If ithis was a Patek .........hmmmm!
Online
User avatar
dj57
Watch Idiot
Watch Idiot
Posts: 1644
Joined: September 21st, 2021, 3:19 pm

Frequent Flyer

Prolific poster

Re: Mistakes watch related and not

Post by dj57 »

The tachymeter bezel – one of the standout features of the Speedmaster – displays a typo. It should be “200”, but instead, it shows “220”.

—> This Speedmasters made in 1970, with the ref. 145.022-69.

—> Apollo13: 11. Apr. 1970 – 17. Apr. 1970

Good thing this one wasn’t sent into space.
User avatar
jrlmsla
VIP
VIP
Posts: 961
Joined: June 4th, 2018, 6:40 am

Microbrand guru

5 year veteran

Frequent Flyer

VIP

HF veteran

Re: Mistakes watch related and not

Post by jrlmsla »

dj57 wrote:Image

A slightly more recent example of a watch that some believed to have been a mistake was an anomalous Nautilus ref. 3710.

The watch is known as the “Lucky Thirteen”
Can you spot the anomaly?
I thought I read that this was a customization requested by the buyer wanting a 13 on the dial, And that to keep the dial aesthetic they just switched the VIII for XIII.
Post Reply