
Sent from my P30 using Tapatalk
I think they do have the right to sue copyright infringements but the case we discuss here is quite hardly one imho.jbglock wrote: ↑June 23rd, 2020, 7:28 pm https://perezcope.com/2019/05/27/rolex- ... from-1955/
I am not an expert but even Giuseppe Panerai called the 3646 a Rolex watch. I hardly think modern Panerai has the high moral ground in all this considering how they have outright lied about history. Things like this make me just enjoy the homages even more.
Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk
That's the point. There is no deception in Awsky look or marketing ...kilowattore wrote:I think they do have the right to sue copyright infringements but the case we discuss here is quite hardly one imho.jbglock wrote: ↑June 23rd, 2020, 7:28 pm https://perezcope.com/2019/05/27/rolex- ... from-1955/
I am not an expert but even Giuseppe Panerai called the 3646 a Rolex watch. I hardly think modern Panerai has the high moral ground in all this considering how they have outright lied about history. Things like this make me just enjoy the homages even more.
Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk
There are plenty of makers selling homages on ebay and other platforms, with or without P logo, that make almost exact copies of the Luminor and Radiomir watches including exact dial layout and they go and sue a factory that's maybe the only one that tries to differentiate? This sounds laughable to me. Check the pic: watches are black, a vague case and dial resemblance and that's all. No one in his right mind could think the awski is a P watch.
Nope, they are both Swiss makers...bmsm wrote:Will AP do the same with GP?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk